While everyone was dressing up as Nicki Minaj for Hallowe’en, the ‘Anaconda’ rapper had her own ideas: she used a popular lingerie set as the foundation for a ‘Bad Teacher’ costume.
In fact, about the only thing she added was the apple, apparently a gift from a teacher’s pet.
Nicki used the red-and-black colorway from the Charlotte range from Parfait by Affinitas for the holiday ensemble. It’s one of the brand’s most popular pin-up looks, offering plenty of support with light padding and bold, solid color combinations.
You can find the line on HerRoom in North America or Large Cup Lingerie in the UK, with bras priced around $45 and the bikini brief at $18. There’s also a high-waisted brief that offers a full vintage look for about $20.
Apple not included.
You can see Nicki’s selfies on her Instagram account, which also offers shots of a few of the thousands of girls who showed up at Hallowe’en parties on Friday with booty boosters and matching stuffed anacondas to complete their Nicki costumes.
Montreal brand Feu De Vénus returns this fall with a series of sophisticated styles that look more like jigsaw puzzles than traditional undergarments.
Designer Véronique Lepage, who launched FDV a year ago, has an eye for sharp angles and intersecting lines that give her pieces the appearance of structural solidity, despite the soft stretch satin and similar fabrics used to create the illusion.
For AW 2014-15, she’s updated some of her original designs, like the powerful Axelle set, and added several new ones, notably the memorable Zelda range (above) with its lace-up high-waist bottoms.
Feu De Vénus likes to explore the interplay between contrasting elements, which is brought to life in the new Sophia style range (lavender lace and black satin) and the all-black lace Maya grouping.
These are dramatic boudoir styles aimed at the luxury consumer in North America and available both through the FDV shop and premium retailers like Nancy Meyer (US) and Dolci Folie (UK). Everything is fabricated in Montreal, making Feu De Vénus an affordable alternative to British labels with a similar aesthetic.
Below are images from the new FDV campaign, which uses shadows and light to create the study in contrasts that is the brand’s signature.
With a growing controversy over its latest advertising campaign and whispers of a possible boycott of its upcoming TV show in London, Victoria’s Secret served up the ultimate distraction yesterday — not one, but two, jewel-encrusted Fantasy bras.
The U.S. lingerie giant has neither acknowledged nor responded to an online petition asking it to remove ads that show 10 slim models under the caption ‘The Perfect Body’. The petition has gathered almost 20,000 signatures and sparked a social media debate under the hashtag #iamperfect, with most people saying the ads are damaging to women and unrepresentative of the female body.
Avoiding the issue is going to become harder for America’s biggest lingerie company, however, as it undertakes a media campaign to promote this year’s Fantasy bras and the annual Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show, which tapes next month in London and airs on Dec. 9.
The company will begin its media juggernaut for the new “Dream Angels Fantasy Bras” tomorrow morning on Good Morning America, where Brazilian models Adriana Lima and Allesandra Ambrosio will face the tough questions.
This year’s blinged-out bras are the 19th and 20th created by the company to promote its annual pre-Christmas TV show. Although often criticized for their unrealistic price tags (which have reached $15 million), the Fantasy bra is also the centrepiece of a marketing campaign that generates many times its value in free advertising around the world.
The 2014 edition marks the first time Victoria’s Secret has offered two Fantasy bras, which this year are priced at $2-million apiece and bear a strong resemblance to the bedlah costumes of Arabic belly dancers.
Both pieces were crafted by Swiss jewelry house Mouawad, which also created the $10-million bra worn by Candice Swanepoel in 2013. Last year’s version was reported to be the first one that Victoria’s Secret has ever sold to a customer, although the company also offered a $300 replica edition for the first time.
How big has the #iamperfect hashtag protest against Victoria’s Secret advertising become? Well, for starters, that’s Lady Gaga below, weighing in on the subject earlier today.
The social media campaign behind an online petition that asks the lingerie company to remove ads bearing the words “The Perfect Body” has exploded in the past two days, with thousands of people worldwide adding their voices.
Other companies unaffiliated with Victoria’s Secret have spoken out, too, and New York underwear brand Dear Kate went so far as to create the above visual rebuttal in a hastily assembled photoshoot early today.
According to the petition on Change.org, the Victoria’s Secret billboards “play on women’s insecurities, and send out a damaging message by positioning the words ‘The Perfect Body’ across models who have exactly the same, very slim body type.
“All this does is perpetuate low self-esteem among women who are made to feel that their bodies are inadequate and unattractive because they do not fit into a narrow standard of beauty. It contributes to a culture that encourages serious health problems such as negative body image and eating disorders.”
Below, we’ve assembled 25 tweets from the #iamperfect campaign that give a sense of what women are angry about and how they want Victoria’s Secret to respond. And yes, we’ve included some of the more … relevant … comments from people who oppose the campaign.
For more, read our earlier report: “Victoria’s Secret Ignores ‘Perfect Body’ Critics At Its Own Peril”
The worst thing about Victoria’s Secret‘s repugnant “Perfect Body” ad campaign isn’t that it’s hurtful to women, it’s that the giant lingerie retailer refuses to participate in the worldwide conversation it has started.
It’s been NINE DAYS since a trio of UK college students launched an online petition asking Victoria’s Secret to remove ads showing the words “The Perfect Body” superimposed over a lineup of 10 slender, lookalike supermodels.
The ads show up on billboards and mall displays in both the UK and U.S. and promote a new bra style in the company’s Body by Victoria collection. The text on the ads refers specifically to the bra’s name, but the unavoidable double meaning has enflamed women everywhere.
The petition has so far gathered more than 15,000 signatures and sparked a social media squall around the hashtag #IAmPerfect, with most commenters slamming Victoria’s Secret for “body-shaming” anyone who doesn’t resemble the company’s Amazonian Angels.
The company’s response? Not a single word.
The campaign has received blanket media coverage in recent days and the online debate has metastasized wildly, bringing overlapping issues like body image, idealized beauty standards, fat shaming, racial diversity, photoshopped ads and other subjects into the conversation. (Predictably, it has also triggered a backlash from virulent, chauvinistic trolls too.)
If the company’s initial offence in creating the ‘Perfect Body’ ads was unintended (let’s give them the benefit of the doubt), its continuing silence on the issue is both perverse and inexplicably dumb. Especially since defusing the situation would have been so easy. Any PR intern could crank out a boilerplate corporate mea culpa and quell the controversy, like this:
“Victoria’s Secret has always supported women of all kinds and rejects any suggestion that one individual’s body shape or size is more worthy than any other. Our advertising is meant to promote healthy lifestyles and happy women regardless of their appearance. We sincerely apologize for any unintended offense caused by our recent campaign.”
It took me 20 seconds to write that — see how easy it is?
Instead, Victoria’s Secret clings to a public relations strategy that looks like it was borrowed from Hong Kong’s political leaders, who resolutely ignore protesters week after week in the delusional hope that one day they’ll just exhaust themselves, shut up and go home.
What makes this whole episode even more incomprehensible is the fact that body-positive messaging has become the default language of fashion marketing today. Brands have become cheerleaders for their customers and are quick to spread feel-good messages about personal empowerment, self-acceptance and positive self-image, whether it reflects an authentic corporate value system or just an effort to pacify customers for profit.
Victoria’s Secret‘s silence suggests it is digging in for a kind of trench warfare with its critics. Apparently, the opinions of those who are hostile toward its shallow, “thinspirational” marketing are irrelevant to a company that boasts having “the sexiest fans on Facebook.”
It pursues this course, though, at its own peril.
These days, companies that disregard the growing power of consumer activism made possible by social media risk being shunned, boycotted or worse. Smart, socially responsible companies react swiftly and with conviction to legitimate public concerns; those that try to ride out PR storms will feel an impact on their bottom line.
Last week, for example, Wal-Mart was outed online after its website was shown to be offering “Fat Girl Costumes” for Hallowe’en. Wal-Mart responded almost instantly, removing the offending items and offering a credible apology that probably appeased its critics.
But when your customers complain and you ignore them, it shows a fundamental lack of respect and a profound disconnect with the realities of commerce. Witness, for example, the recent outcry against a New Zealand fashion company whose CEO told critics to “get a life” when they complained about skinny mannequins in shop windows. “Clothes look better on skinny people,” she blithely retorted. How many current and future customers did they lose that day?
In some ways, we shouldn’t be surprised by Victoria’s Secret‘s non-reaction to its latest public relations disaster.
In recent years the company has endured a long, repetitive list of PR messes that show it is out of touch with contemporary values. In almost every instance, it has let controversies drag on (sometimes for weeks or months) before ultimately issuing an unconvincing press statement while refusing to discuss the matter further.
When parents complained in 2013 about the ‘Bright Young Things’ promotion that appeared to target teen girls, Victoria’s Secret let the issue reach crisis proportions before issuing a too-late-to-matter clarification. When women launched a petition asking the company to sell bras for mastectomy survivors, it collected more than 100,000 signatures before Victoria’s Secret responded — and said no. (There’s something both stupid and cruel about that.)
For most other tempests — whether they involve photoshopped ads, sexualized slogans on its underwear, lack of diversity in its models, or complaints about ethical sourcing and fair labour practices — Victoria’s Secret has nothing to say.
What can possibly explain such an ostrich-like approach to customer relations, especially in an age where crisis communications is a college credit and most corporations are quick to extinguish potentially damaging firestorms?
The obvious, and cynical, answer is that Victoria’s Secret only reacts when its stock price does (and it opened about $1 down today).
But there’s something deeper, and more worrisome, here. Although Victoria’s Secret supports many worthy charitable causes, it really doesn’t have a social activist bone in its Sexy Little Body™. And despite its enormous cultural influence in the lives of women around the world, including young girls, when it comes to speaking up for women it is stubbornly mute.
Sadly, that is its default position. Women’s ongoing struggle for equality, advancement, acceptance and acknowledgment is someone else’s battle to fight; they just sell bras.
So let me amend my opening sentence.
It’s not their silence that is so appalling, it’s what it implies — a shocking lack of empathy and a corporate ethos that perpetuates the stale chauvinist maxim that women should be seen and not heard. That they should avoid public debate and not trouble their pretty little heads with important issues of substance that involve the rights and values of the community they live in.
In other words, like Victoria’s Secret itself, they should just shut up and let their boobs do the talking.
[NOTE: We contacted Victoria’s Secret and invited them to comment on this issue. They did not reply.]